analysis

EU strategy on Central Asia: Realpolitik after all

Almost a year after the adoption of the EU Strategy on Central Asia, the prioritization of issues within EU-Central Asian cooperation have become clearer.

The planning stage of the strategy was marked by a controversy between proponents of an interest-based approach focusing on energy and security, led by Germany; and supporters of a value-based approach that stressed the importance of human rights and democratization, led by the UK, Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden. Hence, the strategy paper represented the minimal consensus among member states. Today, in spite of rhetoric, it has become clearer that in the implementation stage of the strategy the proponents of realpolitik have prevailed.

On closer inspection of the strategy paper and its annexes one cannot help but noticing that rather than a fully-fledged political strategy, one is looking at a framework paper outlining a handful of issues that are deemed to be of some importance. This loftiness is very likely a result of the different views among EU member states during the planning stage. Noticeably absent are benchmarks of any kind. This renders an independent monitoring or evaluation of the progress of the strategy in general, but especially in the area of human rights and rule of law, all but impossible. Nonetheless, EU officials are enthusiastic about the progress of the strategy’s implementation, saying that the results of the first year have exceeded initial expectations. They point to the increased numbers of meetings between EU officials and regional elites, and the prospect of opening more EU member states embassies and EC delegations in the region. In private conversation, however, some officials also acknowledge that progress in the areas of human rights and rule of law is difficult to achieve. Insiders of the human rights dialogues with Uzbekistan report that judging from their behavior, members of the Uzbek delegation in Ashgabat were obviously not interested in conducting a serious dialogue on the issue.

Continue reading…

By Cornelius Graubner (CACI Analyst)

  • Share/Bookmark

Related articles

Discussion

No comments for “EU strategy on Central Asia: Realpolitik after all”

Post a comment

ANALYSIS: Politics gets in way of hydropower investment in Central Asia
March 10, 2010
ANALYSIS: Banks still cautious about lending as Kazakh growth returns
March 2, 2010
ANALYSIS: Eurasian Development Bank seeks to build funds, links
February 23, 2010
ANALYSIS: Kazakh government struggles to help airlines off EU blacklist
February 6, 2010
ANALYSIS: A thaw in Kazakhstan as real estate prices rise again
January 19, 2010
ANALYSIS: Kazakhstan 2010: A transition year
January 13, 2010
Kazakhstan plans tighter regulation of financial sector
December 17, 2009
ANALYSIS: Stagnation in store for Kazakhstan’s banking sector
December 1, 2009
Central Asia’s electricity system falls apart
November 28, 2009
ANALYSIS: Kazakhstan prepares for return of good old commercial banking
October 27, 2009
ANALYSIS: Residential real estate: Good days in Kazakhstan still another 2-3 years off
October 22, 2009
ANALYSIS: Chinese investments in Kazakh energy worry Europeans
October 17, 2009
ANALYSIS: Kazakhstan’s railways to get $36-billion overhaul
October 4, 2009
ANALYSIS: Kazakhstan’s Islamic finance market starts to grow
October 2, 2009
ANALYSIS: A year of opportunity for Halyk Bank
October 1, 2009
Silk Road Intelligencer
Enter your email to sign up


 

May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Business New Europe
Minex Central Asia